Bluefish
Tracks how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other models mention and cite a brand, and generates ranked content recommendations from that data.
- Overall score
- 2.2out of 5
- Rank in AEO software
- 8 of 8
- Confidence
- Low (2 evidence items)
- Pricing model
- Sales-led pricing
- Last reviewed
Score breakdown
| Criterion | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Answer engine coverage | 25% | 2.5out of 5 |
| Sampling transparency | 25% | 1.5out of 5 |
| Citation & source analysis | 20% | 2.5out of 5 |
| Actionability | 15% | 3.0out of 5 |
| Data access | 15% | 1.5out of 5 |
| Weighted overall | 100% | 2.2out of 5 |
Scores are editorial judgments against published criteria. With low confidence, individual criterion scores could reasonably move by half a point with more evidence.
Capabilities
- Citation tracking Yes
- Action plans Yes
- FAQ generator Not verified
- Multi-engine coverage Yes
- SOC 2 Not verified
- Sentiment analysis Yes
Evidence
| Date | Type | What we did |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2026 | Vendor documentation | Product pages describe URL-level citation tracing, daily updates across 10+ models, sentiment, and recommendations ranked by impact and drawn from AI response and citation data. A "static prompt set" is mentioned; no further sampling detail. |
| Oct 6, 2026 | Vendor documentation | No public docs, API reference, pricing, or security pages. Connects to other tools through MCP; CSV export and analytics integrations not found. SOC 2 status not stated on the vendor site. |
Something out of date or wrong? Vendors and readers can request a correction at corrections@gtmregistry.com. See our corrections policy.
Other tools in AEO software
- #1 Novi 3.4out of 5
- #2 AthenaHQ 2.9out of 5
- #3 AirOps 2.8out of 5
- #3 Otterly.AI 2.8out of 5
- #3 Peec AI 2.8out of 5
- #3 Profound 2.8out of 5
- #7 Writesonic 2.7out of 5